Search This Blog

Saturday, 23 August 2014

The Evolution of "Charles Darwin"

Charles Darwin - a name all active atheists know. But what they do not know is that the name evolved.

Charles Darwin invented the Evolution Theory, a theory that atheists believe to be true in reality, that it is what really happened to us, that we came from lower forms of life.

Darwin made the theory because he, himself was an atheist.

Here are some excerpts from his autobiography:

"I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelation,"
"Beautiful as is the morality of the New Testament, it can hardly be denied that its perfection depends in part on the interpretation which we now put on metaphors and allegories,"
"I can indeed hardly see how anyone ought to wish Christianity to be true,"
If Darwin had been alive today, he might have been active in twitter. Anyway, here's what happened to his name. Approximately after 50 years his birth, his name has evolved to:

CHARLES DARWIN ----> CHARLES DAWSON

Who is Charles Dawson? Ladies and gentlemen, allow me to introduce to you a man, though different in appearance from Darwin, though his name is 2 letters different from Darwin, Dawson carried the same atheistic spirit that Darwin had.

In fact, he was too committed to atheism, that because of his extreme love of the idea that God doesn't exist and that evolution is correct, he created another tool to further the cause of atheism. He created Eoanthropus dawsoni or the Piltdown Man.

From an article of the popular TIME Magazine:
Eoanthropus dawsoni was the scientific name of this alleged missing link, and it would have been an extremely early example of a creature showing both human and apelike qualities. At 375,000 years old, it put England in contention for a cradle of humankind, being found in the Sussex town of Piltdown. The "first Englishman" he was proudly called when the anthropologist Charles Dawson found him in 1911. For decades, Piltdown Man was cited along with Neanderthal man and Heidelberg man as an example of early hominid life in Europe. 
Then in 1953, the fragments, including a jawbone, were tested: they did not contain enough fluorine to be the age that Dawson claimed; worse, the jawbone was that of a 10-year-old orangutan, its teeth ground down to simulate age, and a crude chemical wash applied to the bone to make it appear ancient. 
SOURCE: http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1937349_1937350_1937363,00.html
Though the article would not point the blame to Dawson directly, it is only rational to believe that Dawson played a great role in what I call to be the greatest crime in Science.

But it does not end there. For the name has evolved again.

CHARLES DARWIN 
|
|
CHARLES DAWSON
|
|
RICHARD DAWKINS


From a difference of 2 letters, now 3 letters have mutated, and 1 letter was added to form the name Richard Dawkins. but like Dawson, Dawkins carried the same atheistic spirit that Darwin had.

From an excerpt of an article by  of the Religion News Service:

Dawkins was a famous evolutionary biologist before he touted atheism. His 1976 book, “The Selfish Gene,” bridged the gap between academic writing and popular science and became a rare best-seller. In it, he outlined his theory of “memes” — ideas that travel within a culture through discussion, writing or images — which spread far beyond academia and into popular culture.
SOURCE: http://www.religionnews.com/2014/08/07/richard-dawkins/

So Dawkins is also a biologist like Darwin. He too was committed to atheism, and because of his extreme love to the idea that God doesn't exist, he:
His Richard Dawkins Foundation supports dozens of atheist organizations with its annual budget of $800,000 
That's right folks 800,000 American dollars. Why create another Piltdown Man when you can just give atheists, money?

However, even with Dawson's, oops, I mean Darwin, er sorry, I mean Dawkins' financial resources, he is now attracting the same negative attention that Piltdown Man had received after it was discovered as a hoax.


As you can see from the time stamp, that was just 3 days ago. And here are some of the response, that horrible tweet has been getting:




I just hope the horrible name doesn't evolve again.

The End.



----------------------------------

The Unprofitable Blog MAIN MENU

Sherlock Holmes is Not an Atheist

The Decablog (10 Anti Atheism Articles)

Scientists discover that atheists might not exist (featured article)

Stars Prove God is Real (featured article)